Evidence E1.2.2.1.6 Hazard Log

• Is evidence for Claim: C1.2.2.3.3.4.4.1 The safety functions have been categorised and SSCs classified
• Is evidence for Claim: C1.2.2.1 The nature of the hazard is known, complete and a mitigation strategy is in-place for each
• Is evidence for Claim: C1.2.2.4 The robot is operated within an adequate safety management system
• Is evidence for Claim: C1.2.2.2 Safety requirements for the robot have been correctly captured and validated
• Is evidence for Argument: A1.2.2.3.3.4.1.2 The Safe Operating Envelope is provided by compliance with Conditions for Acceptance (CFA) for the pond and compliance with procedural and equipment designations
• Is evidence for Argument: A1.2.2.1.7.3.1 A mitigation strategy exists for Hazard 1 Collision
• Is evidence for Argument: A1.2.2.3.3.1.1 Hazards are managed effectively through the hazard log
• Is evidence for Argument: A1.2.2.1.7.3.2 A mitigation strategy exists for Hazard 2 Splash from Propellers

Child nodes:

1. Contains list of all hazards which those coming from the environment and from within the device
2. Is a live document
3. It contains a summary and links to the hazard mitigation strategies