Claim C1.2.2.1 The nature of the hazard is known, complete and a mitigation strategy is in-place for each

• Is a subclaim of Argument: A1.2.2 All relevant safety requirements have been identified, the robot meets them and it can be safely operated

Child nodes:

• Has subclaim Claim: C1.2.2.1.3 The risks from 'conventional' safety hazards during operation of the robot have been identified, analysed and a mitigation strategy is in-place for each
• Has subclaim Claim: C1.2.2.1.2 This risks from cybersecurity hazards during operation of the robot have been identified, analysed and a mitigation strategy is in-place for each
• Has subclaim Claim: C1.2.2.1.7 The risks from 'nuclear' hazards during operation of the robot have been identified, analysed and a mitigation strategy is in-place for each
• Has subclaim Claim: C1.2.2.1.5 This risks from physical security hazards during operation of the robot have been identified, analysed and a mitigation strategy is in-place for each
• Has support Argument: A1.2.2.1.4 The hazards are complete because...
• Has evidence Evidence: E1.2.2.1.8 Description of the robot system and its operating environment
• Has evidence Evidence: E1.2.2.1.9 Operating Methodology
• Has evidence Evidence: E1.2.2.1.6 Hazard Log
• Has support Other: O1.2.2.1.1 Assumption

1. The hazards should include those from within the robot system and from outside of the system.
2. The hazards should include effects on other parts of the facility. e.g. could an electrical short render other parts of the facility inoperable/unsafe?