Evidence E1.2.2.3.3.4.4.3.2.1.1.6.1.2 SIF Functional and Non Functional Description

• Is evidence for Argument: A1.2.2.3.3.4.4.3.2.1.2.2.4 Environmental monitor Diverse and independent monitors have been designed to use data from the input domain (sensors) to constrain the robot's capabilities to that of the defined environmental operational envelope by applying identified fail safe states.
• Is evidence for Argument: A1.2.2.3.3.4.4.3.2.1.2.2.2 Operational Monitor Diverse and independent monitors have been designed to use data from the input (sensors) and output (actuators) domain to constrain the robot's capabilities to that of the defined operational envelope by applying identified fail safe states.
• Is evidence for Argument: A1.2.2.3.3.4.4.3.2.1.2.2.3 Health Monitor Diverse and independent monitors have been designed to identify excursions from the robot system's 'normal' internal operating health envelope to constrain the robot's capabilities to that of the defined operational envelope by applying identified fail safe states.
• Is evidence for Argument: A1.2.2.3.3.4.4.3.2.1.2 The architecture and algorithms have been designed such that the hazard is mitigated
• Is evidence for Argument: A1.2.2.3.3.4.4.3.2.1.2.2.1 Watch Dog Timers (WDT) have been employed to place the the robot in a safe state if the processing freezes
• Is evidence for Argument: A1.2.2.3.3.4.4.3.2.1.1.6.1 The SIF has undergone functional and non-functional testing which has confirmed its operation according to its requirements specification

Child nodes: