Evidence E1.2.2.1.2.1 Hazard identification, security and analysis report

• Is evidence for Claim: C1.2.2.3.3.4.4.1 The safety functions have been categorised and SSCs classified
• Is evidence for Claim: C1.2.2.1.3 The risks from 'conventional' safety hazards during operation of the robot have been identified, analysed and a mitigation strategy is in-place for each
• Is evidence for Claim: C1.2.2.1.2 This risks from cybersecurity hazards during operation of the robot have been identified, analysed and a mitigation strategy is in-place for each
• Is evidence for Claim: C1.2.2.1.7.2 The severity (consequence) of the radiological hazard during operation is understood
• Is evidence for Claim: C1.2.2.1.5 This risks from physical security hazards during operation of the robot have been identified, analysed and a mitigation strategy is in-place for each
• Is evidence for Argument: A1.2.2.1.7.3.1 A mitigation strategy exists for Hazard 1 Collision
• Is evidence for Argument: A1.2.2.1.4 The hazards are complete because...
• Is evidence for Argument: A1.2.2.1.7.1.1 A hazard identification and analysis has been performed supported by the use of simulation models as necessary to identify possible accident sequences. Worst case consequences have been identified.
• Is evidence for Argument: A1.2.2.2.1.1 A hazard identification and analysis for the operational tasks has been performed and functional and non functional requirements identified
• Is evidence for Argument: A1.2.2.1.7.3.3 All hazards are tolerable and ALARP holistically because...

Child nodes:

• Has support Other: O1.2.2.1.2.1.1 Summary of hazards

 Analysis of the hazards against high level principles